Untitled Document The Effect of Matrices in the Analysis of Mercury by ICP
Bill Driscoll
Mercury analysis is one of the most difficult analyses by ICP and ICP/MS instrumentation.
Mercury standards are sold in nitric acid. However, nitric acid alone is not an ideal matrix for analysis. Diluted mercury standards in nitric acid matrix show a lot of variation when analyzed over a period of time. SPEX CertiPrep conducted a study on the effect of matrices in the analysis of Hg by ICP.
Solution preparation: NIST SRM 3131 was diluted to 100 mg/L in two different nitric acid concentrations, 10% HNO3 and 5% HNO3. These two solutions were further diluted to 2 mg/L on five different days in four different matrices as shown in Table 1
Solution analysis: Initial calibration was done using 2 mg/L Hg in 20% HCl/1% HNO3. Final analysis was done on all the diluted samples at the same date following completion of analysis of a given matrix diluted on different days before taking up the second matrix.
Conclusion: Results are shown in Table 2: Concentration shown is the average of four replicates in three wavelengths, 253, 194 and 184 nanometers. Consistent analytical results are obtained when mercury is analyzed in 2% HCl + 1% HNO3 or in 20% HCl + 1% HNO3 when the different dilutions are analyzed over a period of time. Addition of gold to nitric acid matrix also produced repeatable results. F test showed no significant difference in the standard deviations between these matrices while the standard deviation was very significantly higher for the analysis in 2% nitric acid alone. It is concluded that nitric acid alone is not an ideal matrix for the analysis of Mercury.
Table 1:
Matrix
| Addition of Gold | Comments |
2% HNO3 | 0 | Wide variation in the results |
2% HNO3+ 4 drops HCl | 400 ug/L | No variations |
2% HCl + 1% HNO3 | 0 | No variations |
20% HCl + 1% HNO3 | 0 | No variations |
Table 2:
| 2% HNO3 | 2% HNO3 + 0.4ppm Au + 4 drop HCl | 2% HCL + 1% HNO3 | 20% HCL + 1% HNO3 |
| 5% HNO3 | 10% HNO3 | 5% HNO3 | 10% HNO3 | 5% HNO3 | 10% HNO3 | 5% HNO3 | 10% HNO3 |
| mg/L | mg/L | mg/L | mg/L | mg/L | mg/L | mg/L | mg/L |
9/1/10 | 3.77 | 7.59 | 1.79 | 1.79 | 2.08 | 2.01 | 2.06 | 2.05 |
9/2/10 | 6.87 | 6.30 | 1.76 | 1.75 | 2.08 | 2.09 | 2.04 | 2.05 |
9/9/10 | 5.06 | 8.14 | 1.76 | 1.76 | 2.08 | 2.05 | 2.07 | 2.06 |
11/10/10 | 1.93 | 3.21 | 1.76 | 1.75 | 2.07 | 2.07 | 2.04 | 2.05 |
11/12/10 | 2.25 | 3.44 | 1.76 | 1.73 | 2.09 | 2.09 | 2.04 | 2.02 |
Std.dev | 2.048 | 2.301 | 0.015 | 0.024 | 0.008 | 0.031 | 0.015 | 0.016 |
The process below outlines the difference between a calibration standard and a check standard:
1. Make an educated approximation as to the elements and their concentrations in your unknown sample.
2. You would buy a Certified Reference Material that contains the elements in the sample you'd like to analyze. This is your calibration standard.
3. Dilute the calibration standard to three or four different dilutions and run a curve.
4. Run another known standard (QC check standard) with concentrations within this range and calculate the recovery. Usually the lab defines what a suitable recovery should be depending on the regulations they adhere to.
5. Run your unknown sample.
6. Spike the QC standard at a similar concentration as your step 4. Verify the spike recovery.